Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 27;35(2):455–470. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22192

Table 3.

Peaks of clusters of stronger activation in good versus bad imagers for the main contrasts of our task

Area BA MNI Z‐score Cluster size
x y z
MI > C: good>bad (P(unc) < 0.001)
L sup frontal gyrus 10 −24 57 3 4.00 15
L fusiform gyrus −27 −75 −15 3.92 71
L cerebellum −3 −75 −12 3.80 58
R thalamus 3 −12 3 3.77 14
L cerebellum −42 −54 −45 3.69 15
R cerebellum 45 −45 −42 3.55 17
R postcentral gyrus 4 45 −24 48 3.46 10
MI > VI: good > bad, inclusively masked by MI > C_good (P(unc) < 0.005)
R inf temporal gyrus 20 45 −3 −39 3.89 18
R cerebellum 39 −45 −27 3.39 25
R sup temporal gyrus 54 −18 −3 2.87 18
L hippocampus −21 −36 −3 3.20 20
R cerebellum 9 −66 −18 3.15 27
L cerebellum −24 −72 −24 3.04 14
MID > MIE: good > bad, inclusively masked by MID > MIE_good (P(unc) < 0.001)
R suppl. motor area 24 6 0 45 3.78 12
R suppl. motor area 6 12 −15 54 3.51 15

There were never significantly greater activations in bad than good imagers. MI = motor imagery, C = control, VI = visual imagery, MID = motor imagery difficult, MIE = motor imagery easy.