Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 2;35(8):3625–3645. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22426

Table 3.

Functional imaging results from a one‐sample t‐test (1) and independent two sample t‐tests (2‐3) for the main effect of training between young (Y) and older (O) subjects

Hemisphere Region Subregion cluster X Y Z z P
Training Session: Effect of Training
1. Main effect training (all participants)
Right Parietal Somatosensory 31399 40 −30 60 0.000
Left Cerebellum V 9583 −14 −52 −18 0.000
Left Frontal Middle 203 −36 42 26 5.59 0.000
Left Hippocampus 14 −24 −36 8 5.55 0.000
Right Temporal Inferior 81 56 −38 −18 5.28 0.002
Right Temporal Middle 36 50 −50 4 5.26 0.002
Right Occipital Calcarine 37 28 −68 6 5.08 0.005
Right Hippocampus 3 22 −34 10 4.80 0.016
Left Caudate 9 −10 18 2 4.79 0.017
Left Temporal Inferior 3 −54 −40 −18 4.71 0.023
Right Hippocampus 3 30 −40 6 4.66 0.029
Left Caudate 1 −20 16 14 4.63 0.032
Right Cerebellum CrusII 2 26 −88 −34 4.62 0.034
Training Session: Effect of Age
2. Main effect training (Y‐O) No significant voxels
3. Main effect training (O‐Y)
Left Frontal Superior Medial 42 −8 36 56 5.43 0.001
Left Occipital Middle 120 −26 −92 0 5.20 0.003
Right Occipital Middle 62 26 −88 0 4.98 0.007

Note: Main effect of training (all participants) and age thresholded at P < 0.05 FWE.