Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 19;36(2):475–488. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22641

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The average Fisher‐z values (across 33 subjects) was plotted for each pair of numbers (Fig. 5) against the proportion of tuning curve overlap for those two numbers (assuming an analogue representation, see Fig. 1). Note that a log‐fit was similar for both formats (nonsymbolic: left: R 2 = 0.68, right: R 2 = 0.64; symbolic: left: R 2 = 0. 01, right: R 2 = 0.01).