Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 24;35(9):4345–4361. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22479

Table 3.

Intraoperative language network mapping and functional outcome

Cortical HFES at the frontal stimulus site CCEPAL→PL N1 latency (ms) CCEP amplitude decrease (%) Subcortical HFES at WM stimulus site SCEP N1 latency (ms)
SCEPWM→AL SCEPWM→PL SCEPWM→AL + SCEPWM→PL Language disturbance
Language impairment Onset Peak Language impairment Onset Peak Onset Peak Onset/peak Intraoperative Postoperative (day 1)
Patient 1 Yes 7.6 30.8 0 No no response no response no response No No
Patient 2 Yes 12.8 27.4 12 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. No No
Patient 3 Yes 12.8 29.2 0 Yes 5.6 24.6 6.4 19.6 12.0/44.2 No No
Patient 4 Yes 11.0 25.0 32 Yes 7.2 19.0 4.2 12.0 11.4/31.0 Yesa Yes
Patient 5 Yes 9.6 32.0 0 Yes 6.2 17.6 4.0 15.8 10.2/33.4 No Yes
Patient 6 Yes 13.0 33.2 0 No 6.6 22.6 3.2 18.0 9.8/40.6 No No

All latencies were measured in the awake condition.

HFES = high‐frequency electrical stimulation; AL = anterior language area; PL = posterior language area; WM = white matter; n.a. = not available (no stimulation).

a

Language disturbance was already observed before the CCEP amplitude decreased because of the partial cortical resection of the supramarginal gyrus