Table II.
Face emotion recognition evaluation (group analysis)
| Disgust faces | Happy faces | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Answers | Baseline | UpRegulation | P = | Answers | Baseline | UpRegulation | P = |
| Disgust | 68 | 87 | 0.02 | Happiness | 132 | 109 | 0.02 |
| Sadness | 30 | 34 | n.s. | Sadness | 2 | 5 | n.s. |
| Fear | 13 | 16 | n.s. | Fear | 4 | 1 | n.s. |
| Anger | 57 | 35 | 0.015 | Anger | 0 | 3 | n.s. |
| Neutral | 4 | 7 | n.s. | Neutral | 20 | 29 | n.s. |
| Surprise | 6 | 0 | n.s. | Surprise | 19 | 31 | n.s. |
| Happiness | 2 | 1 | n.s. | Disgust | 3 | 2 | n.s. |
| Total | 180 | 180 | Total | 180 | 180 | ||
The table displays results of the emotion recognition test in all patients following conditions “baseline” and “upregulation.” Numbers represent the total number of selections of the emotions indicated in the first left columns, under the headings “disgust faces” and “happy faces.” As 20 numbers of happy and 20 numbers of disgust faces were presented per condition (up‐regulation and baseline) to each subject (n = 9), the total number of possible answers for each of these two emotions was 180. Right columns under the headings “disgust faces” and “happy faces” show the P‐values for the statistics comparing the number of selections for each emotion between baseline and upregulation conditions.