Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 26;34(11):3066–3074. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22123

Table 1.

Results of Tobit regressions (RAVLT) and linear regressions (ROCFT) analyses of left and right hippocampus with the memory scores as outcome variable and 5‐HT4R binding and scanner type as explanatory variables

Memory score Region Estimate (β) ± SE R 2 95% CI P‐value
RAVLT immediate recall Left hippocampus −37.9 ± 14.5 /BPND 0.23a −66.4 to −9.4 0.009
Right hippocampus −37.3 ± 14.5 /BPND 0.21a −65.8 to −8.8 0.010
RAVLT delayed recall Left hippocampus −4.6 ± 4.0 /BPND 0.05a −12.5 to 3.3 0.25
Right hippocampus −9.6 ± 3.9 /BPND 0.17a −17.2 to −1.9 0.014
ROCFT immediate recall Left hippocampus −1.9 ± 5.4 /BPND 0.02 −13.1 to 9.2 0.71
Right hippocampus −3.7 ± 5.7 /BPND 0.03 −15.4 to 8.0 0.52
ROCFT delayed recall Left hippocamp−us −5.1 ± 5.1 /BPND 0.05 −16.0 to 4.9 0.29
Right hippocampus −4.7 ± 5.4 /BPND 0.04 −15.8 to 6.3 0.39
a

McKelvey‐Zavoina Pseudo‐R 2 defined as ratio of variance of prediction and the latent response [Veall and Zimmermann, 1994].

RAVLT, Reys Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ROCFT, Rey‐Osterrieth's Complex Figure Test; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval.