Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 18;34(3):519–529. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21449

Table II.

Anatomical regions of correlations across the whole cohort

Anatomical location Cluster size T score P value (FWE corrected)
Tongue force GM R caudate 1007 7.27 <0.001
R precentral gyrus 385 6.93 <0.001
L caudate 738 6.72 <0.001
R cuneus 115 6.46 <0.001
R precuneus 295 6.43 <0.001
L precuneus 90 6.09 <0.001
WM R occipital lobe 27 5.46 0.003
L occipital lobe 43 5.38 0.004
R internal capsule 36 5.38 0.004
Splenium corpus callosum 31 5.05 0.017
L frontal lobe 3 5.03 0.018
Metronome tapping precision GM L putamen 754 6.65 <0.001
R putamen 905 6.59 <0.001
WM R internal capsule 272 6.11 <0.001
L internal capsule 435 5.92 <0.001
R external capsule 15 5.37 0.005
Antisaccade error rate GM L caudate 1179 7.02 <0.001
R caudate 870 6.99 <0.001
L lateral occipital gyrus 12 5.26 0.017
R superior temporal gyrus 4 5.18 0.023
L putamen 3 5.08 0.036
R inferior frontal gyrus 2 5.03 0.043
WM L external capsule 78 5.98 <0.001
R internal capsule 387 5.68 0.001
L internal capsule 234 5.67 0.001
R occipital lobe 71 5.54 0.002
L parietal lobe 68 5.34 0.005
R frontal lobe 23 5.15 0.011
Recognition of negative emotions GM L precentral gyrus 16 5.26 0.018
R precuneus 8 5.26 0.018
R cuneus 23 5.25 0.019
L lingual gyrus 4 5.24 0.019
R lingual gyrus 5 5.19 0.024
WM L external capsule 61 5.52 0.002
R parietal lobe 42 5.17 0.011
R superior frontal lobe 17 5.15 0.011
R inferior parietal lobe 40 5.10 0.013

Results shown are the most significant local maxima more than 8‐mm apart with a familywise error corrected P value of <0.05.