Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 9;33(2):431–454. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21222

Table VI.

Studies entered into the meta‐analyses of static stimuli

Ref. Meth. N Stimuli Task
Faces
Bird fMRI 1.5 16 Faces > Houses Passive viewing
Benuzzi,2007 fMRI 3T 24 Faces or faces parts > mosaic pattern Gender decision
Blonder fMRI 1.5T 14 Faces > House Passive viewing
Gorno‐Tempini,1998 PET 6 Faces > scrambled images Same‐different decision
Haxby,1999 fMRI 5 Faces > Houses Match‐to‐sample task
Holt,2006 fMRI 1.5T 16 Faces > Blank Passive viewing
Ishai,2005 fMRI 12 Faces > scrambled images
Keslwer‐West,2001 fMRI 1.5T 21 Faces > scrambled images Concentrate on expression
Kitada,2009 fMRI 3T 16 Faces > Objects Identification
Kowatari,2004 fMRI 12 Familiar faces > Blank Decide identity
Pierce,2004 fMRI 1.5T 10 Faces > Blank Passive viewing
Pinsk,2009 fMRI 3T 10 Faces > Objects Fixation task
Platek, 2006 fMRI 3T 12 Faces > Scrambled images Decide known/unknown
Pourtois,2005 fMRI 1.5T 13 Faces > Houses Gender categorization
Willems,2010 fMRI 3T 16 Faces > Chairs Monitor (rare) repetition of stimulus
Wright,2006 fMRI 1.5T 12 Faces > scrambled images Identity matching
Body or body parts
Bracci,2010 fMRI 3T 15 Body parts > Objects One‐back task
Hodzic, 2009 fMRI 3T 10 Body > Object
Hodzic, 2009 fMRI 3T 16 Body > Object
Kitada,2009 fMRI 3T 16 Hand or foot > Object Identification
Pinsk,2009 fMRI 3T 10 Hand or Foot > Object Fixation task
Willems,2010 fMRI 3T 16 Body > Chairs Monitoring

Meth = method: fMRI field strength or PET; N = number of subjects.