Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 2;32(10):1519–1534. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21124

Table I.

Mean percentage errors and RTs (plus standard deviations) across Task and Repetition for Experiment 1 and Stimulus‐modality, Task, and Repetition for Experiment 2

Stimulus‐type Picture‐Picture Word‐Picture
Task Same Reverse Same Reverse
Errors
Experiment 1 Novel Picture‐Picture condition not included in Experiment 1 13.5 (5.4) 16.7 (5.4)
Repeated 13.6 (6.4) 14.4 (4.7)
Experiment 2 Novel 12.1 (5.6) 15.3 (5.7) 11.8 (6.1) 15.7 (6.1)
Repeated 12.2 (4.7) 12.8 (5.4) 12.8 (5.8) 13.1 (5.4)
RTs
Experiment 1 Novel Picture‐Picture condition not included in Experiment 1 859 (210) 791 (130)
Repeated 827 (200) 780 (134)
Experiment 2 Novel 894 (127) 1005 (146) 905 (147) 990 (129)
Repeated 772 (103) 921 (133) 847 (132) 976 (144)

Results from Experiment 2 are collapsed across Prime‐level for clarity. Note that this factor did not interact significantly with Stimulus‐modality or Task so is of little theoretical interest.