Table III.
Nodes showing significant changes in Enodal, at a cost of 0.28 corresponding to the smallest P‐value indicating an increase of Eglob
| Location | Rest | Task | t | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increased Enodal during the task | ||||
| FC1 | 0.485 ± 0.063 | 0.659 ± 0.040 | −2.823 | 0.014 |
| FC3 | 0.304 ± 0.045 | 0.466 ± 0.037 | −2.597 | 0.021 |
| C3 | 0.490 ± 0.053 | 0.689 ± 0.046 | −3.224 | 0.006 |
| C4 | 0.542 ± 0.060 | 0.748 ± 0.057 | −3.359 | 0.005 |
| CP1 | 0.955 ± 0.028 | 1.055 ± 0.032 | −2.922 | 0.011 |
| CP3 | 0.587 ± 0.065 | 0.700 ± 0.043 | −2.389 | 0.032 |
| Decreased Enodal during the task | ||||
| P5 | 0.239 ± 0.066 | 0.121 ± 0.065 | 2.543 | 0.023 |
| POz | 0.661 ± 0.037 | 0.548 ± 0.049 | 2.881 | 0.012 |
| PO3 | 0.326 ± 0.069 | 0.229 ± 0.063 | 2.332 | 0.035 |
| PO4 | 0.369 ± 0.063 | 0.274 ± 0.064 | 2.227 | 0.043 |
All values presented as mean ± SEM (standard error of mean).