Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 20;33(11):2714–2727. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21395

Table IV.

Comparisons of the regional mean contrast magnitudes of ROIs between the post‐training and baseline occasions for the early blind and normal vision groups

ROI L/R Label Mean response magnitude (SD)
Early blind group Normal vision group
After training Baseline t‐Values After training Baseline t‐Valuesa
1 R Inferior frontal gyrus 7.532 (1.602) 5.177 (4.135) 1.909 2.031 (2.913) 1.571 (2.532) 0.974
2 L Inferior parietal cortex 6.457 (3.362) 3.342 (4.165) 2.597 2.068 (0.963) 1.384 (1.105) 2.083
3 R Inferior parietal cortex 5.872 (2.264) 2.419 (3.199) 4.463** 1.229 (1.781) 0.956 (1.570) 0.443
4 L Hippocampus 2.087 (1.719) 0.243 (1.787) 3.139* −0.201 (1.600) −0.428 (1.088) 0.390
5 R Cuneus 9.127 (4.051) 3.951 (4.175) 3.058* 0.313 (2.360) −0.467 (1.391) 1.184
6 L Cuneus 8.180 (3.554) 4.943 (6.327) 1.734 0.838 (4.985) −0.068 (1.532) 0.795
7 L Middle occipital gyrus 7.146 (5.012) 4.824 (5.255) 2.617 −0.807 (3.064) −1.082 (1.458) 0.416
8 R Inferior occipital gyrus 7.628 (3.586) 4.263 (4.781) 2.217 −1.151 (4.955) −1.603 (1.430) 0.367

The ROIs 1–3 mediate cross auditory‐spatial processing (auditory localization, spatial judgment); ROI 4 mediates associative learning (general), and ROIs 5–8 mediate associative learning (occipital enhancement). ROIs with asterisks were statistically significant:

*

P ≤ 0.050 and

**

P ≤ 0.001 (significance levels set were P ≤ 0.050 for ROIs 1 and 4, P ≤ 0.025 for ROIs 2 and 3, and P ≤ 0.0125 for ROIs 5 to 8).

a

All t‐values for the normal vision group are not statistically significant only that of the left inferior parietal cortex obtained a marginal value, i.e. P = 0.058.