Table III.
IE of distracters in Saccadic and Hand pointing tasks
Side | Anatomical area | IE for distracter by effector | IE for Saccade G > H | IE for Hand pointing H > G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t test values | P corr. | t test values | P uncorr. | t test values | P uncorr. | ||
L | FEF | 3.06 | <0.01 | 3.04 | <0.01 | 1.82 | n.s. |
IPS | 2.47 | <0.05 | 1.32 | n.s. | 2.52 | <0.01 | |
PPC | 1.87 | n.s. | 1.43 | n.s. | 1.36 | n.s. | |
R | FEF | 2.33 | 0.068 | 2.36 | <0.05 | 1.41 | n.s. |
IPS | 2.32 | 0.069 | 0.71 | n.s. | 2.79 | <0.01 | |
PPC | 2.33 | 0.068 | 2.57 | <0.01 | 1.22 | n.s. |
Anatomical locations of ROIs, t test, and P values (Bonferroni‐corr) for the IE of social distracter (Gaze = G/Hand = H) by effector (Saccade/Pointing), in the Left/Right (L/R) hemispheres. A significant interaction was found for L FEF and L IPS, whereas a trend toward significance was found for R FEF and R IPS. Additional t test (P uncorr) confirmed a significant larger differential effect for (G > H) distracter in the L and R FEF, whereas bilateral IPS showed a larger IE for (H > G; see Results section for more details), indicating a selective correspondence between G/H body‐part and saccadic/hand‐pointing effector.