Table III.
Left (white background). A summary of the ACC locations found to be activated in emotional Go/Nogo paradigms as reported in the literature. Coordinates of these locations are reported in MNI space. Studies that originally listed coordinates in Talairach space were translated into MNI space using Matthew Brett's tal2mni script, implemented in Matlab (http://www.mrccbu.cam.ac.uk/Imaging/mnispace.html) [Brett et al.,2001]. Right (gray background). Statistical results of repeated‐measures ANOVAs with respect to Trial type (two levels: Go, Nogo), Emotion (three levels: A−, N, A+), and the interaction effect of Trial type × Emotion on mean N2 and P3 current densities within each ROI (radius = 9 mm).
| ANOVA present study's results for each ROI (radius = 9 mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A: Inhibition‐sensitive locations | N2‐related ROI activity | P3‐related ROI activity | |||
| Study | Contrast | MNI coordinates x y z | BA | Trial type (Nogo, Go) (gl = 1, 29) | Trial type (Nogo, Go) (gl = 1, 29) |
| Albert et al.,2010 | Nogo vs. Go | 5 25 20 | 24/33 | F = 8.488, P = 0.007 | F = 9.319, P = 0.005 |
| Berkman et al.,2009 | Nogo vs. Go | −6 12 40 | 32 | F = 5.563, P = 0.025 | F = 5.924, P = 0.021 |
| Elliott et al.,2000 | All Go/Nogo vs. Rest | 3 19 53 | 8/6/32 | F = 5.476, P = 0.026 | F = 5.825, P = 0.022 |
| −3 13 50 | 6/32 | F = 8.101, P = 0.008 | F = 5.564, P = 0.025 | ||
| Hare et al.,2005 | Nogo vs. Go | 11 35 21 | 32 | F = 8.224, P = 0.008 | F = 9.201, P = 0.005 |
| Schulz et al.,2009 | Nogo vs. Go | 2 2 48 | 24/32 | F = 9.426, P = 0.005 | F = 4.977, P = 0.034 |
| B: Emotion‐sensitive locations | N2‐related ROI activity | P3‐related ROI activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Contrast | MNI coordinates x y z | BA | Emotion (A−, N, A+) (gl = 2, 58) | Emotion (A−, N, A+) (gl = 2, 58) |
| Berkman et al.,2009 | Pos vs. Baseline | 10 14 40 | 32 | F = 1.887, P = 0.169 | F = 0.791, P = 0.434 |
| Elliott et al.,2000 | (GoPos, GoNeg) vs. GoNeu | −6 37 −1 | 32/10 | F = 0.604, P = 0.508 | F = 0.368, P = 0.665 |
| Go Pos vs. Go Neg | 6 0 24 | 32/24 | F = 0.881, P = 0.419 | F = 4.143, P = 0.028 | |
| Hare et al.,2005 | (GoNeg, GoNeu) vs. (GoNeg, GoPos) | −7 −4 53 | 6/24 | F = 4.662, P = 0.017 | F = 0.835, P = 0.438 |
| Schulz et al.,2009 | Pos vs. Neu | −8 −14 56 | 6/31/24 | F = 3.905, P = 0.032 | F = 0.849, P = 0.427 |
| Shafritz et al.,2006 | GoNeg vs. GoPos | −13 23 −5* | 11/24 | F = 0.524, P = 0.588 | F = 2.278, P = 0.12 |
| C: Interaction‐sensitive locations | N2‐related ROI activity | P3‐related ROI activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Contrast | MNI coordinates x y z | BA | Trial type × Emotion (gl = 2, 58) | Trial type × Emotion (gl = 2, 58) |
| Albert et al.,2010 | Trial type (Go, Nogo) × Emotion (Neg, Neu, Pos) | 5 25 20 | 24/33 | F = 0.615, P = 0.499 | F = 3.855, P = 0.043 |
| Goldstein et al.,2007 | (Neg vs. Neu) × (Nogo vs. Go) | 9 −3 36 | 24 | F = 2.276, P = 0.117 | F = 2.487, P = 0.106 |
| Shafritz et al.,2006 | NogoNeg vs. NogoPos | 9 35 7* | 24/32 | F = 1.181, P = 0.314 | F = 2.71, P = 0.091 |
| −5 39 7* | 32/24 | F = 0.589, P = 0.549 | F = 1.743, P = 0.193 | ||
ROI, region of interest; Neg, negative; Neu, neutral; Pos, positive; BA, Brodmann's area; A−, arousing negative; N, neutral; A+, arousing positive; df, degrees of freedom.
Precise coordinates were provided directly by Keith M. Shafritz.