Skip to main content
. 2010 Jun 1;32(3):397–412. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21022

Table I.

Dipole locations for individual observers: The results of ECDs for the succeeded case for individual observes Inline graphic

Latency (ms) GOF (%) Dipole (No.) x (mm) y (mm) z (mm) Intensity (nA m)
Succeeded case: Early component (100–150 ms)
Subject 1 115 89.8 1 −46.9 37.3 44.7 3.0
2 10.2 68.9 32.1 10.7
Subject 2 130 87.8 1 −41.5 55.3 41.8 13.1
2 5.1 29.8 55.8 22.7
Subject 3 132 86.3 1 −48.3 48.2 38.3 16.1
2 −16.1 23.8 55.9 21.5
Subject 4 134 87.6 1 −28.5 59.2 32.4 2.1
2 44.3 73.4 11.6 7.7
Subject 5 126 85.6 1 −34.3 49.2 35.0 6.1
2 20.9 82.1 40.0 4.1
Subject 6 136 89.4 1 −42.0 62.3 36.5 8.5
2 36.2 27.1 65.5 6.4
M300
Subject 1 300 89.2 1 24.6 6.8 21.3 12.4
2 −46.8 −13.1 58.6 6.4
Subject 2 298 89.5 1 43.7 21.6 19.5 12.7
2 −52.6 −17.5 48.2 9.6
Subject 3 296 86.4 1 −0.5 −38.7 26.8 7.5
2 75.7 32.5 30.7 3.3
Subject 4 312 89.6 1 7.4 41.4 13.6 6.8
2 −39.3 −18.2 57.1 3.7
Subject 5 308 89.4 1 27.6 42.8 48.3 7.8
2 −34.0 −26.3 40.8 5.6

The observers with GOFs greater than 85% were selected. The results of failed case are not shown because the early component in the case was similar to the result of succeeded cases and there were no typical peaks for p300 in the condition. The 3/6 observers showed the activity around the right MT + region (subjects 1, 2, and 4) and one of dipoles around 300 ms for 3/5 selected observes showed activation in frontal cortex (the second dipole of subjects 1, 2, and 4).