Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 18;34(3):543–565. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21453

Table I.

Response patterns (oxy‐Hb signal changes) in the infant cortex during audio‐visual presentations

Studies Present study Watanabe et al. [2008]
Stimuli Sound‐object No‐sound Sound‐object No‐object
Video image Sound Mobile Mobile Mobile · Mobile Mobile Checkerboard Mobile
No. of Ch Regions
 L24 STG (early auditory) + > + +
 L22 MTGa + > +/− + +
 L2 MOG (early visual) + > + + +
 L10 MOG (LO) + + + > ·
 L17 MTGp + > + + > +
 L18 IPL + > + + > +
 L36 IFG + + + > +
 L44 SFG + > · + > ·

Notes: The results of the present and previous studies (Watanabe et al. 2008) that used mulitchannel NIRS are summarized in this table. In both the present and previous studies, mobile objects with the sound of ringing bells produced by the moving mobiles were presented. In order to compare the effects of the sound‐objects presentation, the no‐sound stimuli (in the present study) and the no‐object stimuli (the checkerboard pattern reversal in the previous study) were presented. “Ch” means measurement channel. The characters “+”, “‐”, and “.” indicate significant activation, significant deactivation, and non‐significant response, respectively. The “+” and “‐” characters for the MTGa region in the present study indicate activation in the early time windows and deactivation in the late time windows. The inequality sign (“>”) indicates the results of the direct comparisons between the 2 conditions in each study.