Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 14;34(5):1230–1244. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21510

Table V.

One‐way ANOVAs evaluating main effects of radius (r = 20, 25, 30, and 35 mm) within each age group in each region

Brain region 8–12 years 13–15 years 16–19 years
Left F 3,20/P Right F 3,20/P Left F 3,35/P Right F 3,35/P Left F 3,40/P Right F 3,39/P
Frontal 9.1/<0.001 11.5/<0.001 7.7/0.0004 8.1/0.0003 6.5/0.001 10.9/<0.001
Parietal 11.3/<0.001 6.4/0.003 5.8/0.002 10.0/<0.001 6.5/0.001 11.8/<0.001
Temporal 6.6/0.003 9.3/<0.001 6.9/0.001 9.96/<0.001 7.4/0.0005 19.8/<0.001
Medial Temporal 0.06/0.98 0.3/0.8 0.23/0.9 1.6/0.2 0.3/0.8 0.2/0.9
Occipital 1.8/0.2 1.0/0.4 0.13/0.9 2.1/0.1 0.49/0.7 0.5/0.7
Cingulate 1.5/0.3 0.76/0.5 0.98/0.4 1.3/0.3 2.3/0.1 2.1/0.1

Note that the effect of the choice of radius using the approach Schaer et al. (2008) is highly significant for most cortical regions. This shows that this approach to measure GI is less stable.