Skip to main content
. 2010 May 6;32(3):413–425. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21030

Table II.

Repeated measures ANOVA of graph parameters for each frequency band

Within‐subjects Between‐subjects
Time Time×gender Gender
Clustering index
 Theta F[225] = 1.643 F[225] = 2.386 F[225] = 3.754
P = 0.201 P = 0.124 P = 0.054
 Alpha F[225] = 7.087 F[225] = 2.150 F[225] = 10.966
P = 0.008 P = 0.144 P = 0.001
 Beta F[225] = 0.054 F[225] = 2.642 F[225] = 9.207
P = 0.816 P = 0.105 P = 0.003
Pathlength
 Theta F[225] = 28.297 F[225] = 0.001 F[225] = 0.194
P = 0.000 P = 0.977 P = 0.660
 Alpha F[225] = 30.989 F[225] = 2.540 F[225] = 2.419
P = 0.000 P = 0.112 P = 0.121
 Beta F[225] = 55.416 F[225] = 0.061 F[225] = 0.498
P = 0.000 P = 0.805 P = 0.481
Weight dispersion
 Theta F[225] = 8.188 F[225] = 0.010 F[225] = 0.244
P = 0.005 P = 0.919 P = 0.622
 Alpha F[225] = 8.468 F[225] = 5.252 F[225] = 0.351
P = 0.004 P = 0.023 P = 0.554
 Beta F[225] = 34.756 F[225] = 0.813 F[225] = 7.153
P = 0.000 P = 0.368 P = 0.008

Normalized graph parameters were analyzed for separated frequency bands. F‐values and their significance are shown, both for “within‐subject” analysis (left of vertical line), and for “between‐subject” analysis. Degrees of freedom are printed between square brackets. Bold text represents a significant effect on the variance in the graph parameters. Cursive text represents a trend.