Skip to main content
. 2010 Sep 30;32(10):1750–1761. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21144

Table I.

Regions of significant activation in the comparison between the face‐string sequence and the scrambled string

Region BA MNI coordinates t Cluster size
(a) face‐string > scrambled string
 L medial frontal gyrus 6 −4, 12, 48 6.46 853
 R medial frontal gyrus 6 0, 2, 53
 R cingulate gyrus 32 8, 18, 43
 R inferior frontal gyrus 44 52, 8, 27 5.59 125
 L superior parietal lobule 7 −26, −64, 51 5.17 27
 R superior parietal lobule 7 32, −56, 51 5.05 12
 L precuneus 7 −26, −52, 48 4.82 7
 R precuneus 7 22, −62, 37 4.96 16
 L insula −30, 22, 3 6.74 219
 R insula 32, 24, 0 6.37 293
 R fusiform gyrus 37 38, −48, −16 7.08 1,733
 L middle occipital gyrus 18 −32, −90, 13 6.36 1,487
18 −32, −82, 8
 R middle occipital gyrus 19 46, −74, −8
19 34, −80, 5
 L inferior occipital gyrus 18 −40, −78, −11
 R tectum 6, −28, −11 6.84 836
 R subthalamic nucleus 8, −14, −3
 L thalamus (dm) −2, −14, −8
 L lentiform nucleus −14, 0, −5 5.05 9
 R lentiform nucleus 16, 6, −5 5.21 69
(b) internal encoders > external encoders
 R fusiform gyrus 37 38, −48, −13 5.04 44
(c) external encoders > internal encoders
 L medial frontal gyrus 8 −2, 36, 48 2.97 12

Functional activations in correctly classified trials (a) for the entire sample thresholded at P < 0.05 (FWE corrected) and k = 7, and for the comparison of (b) internal against external and (c) external against internal encoders thresholded at P < 0.001 (uncorrected) and k = 7.