Skip to main content
. 2011 Aug 8;33(10):2362–2376. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21369

Table III.

Interaction and between‐group contrasts of the prediction error fMRI analysis at recall of extinction

Cluster Voxel
P corr k t peak X Y Z
Group × stimulus interaction
 Middle temporal gyrus (L) 0.035 53 F: 15.66 −62 −42 2
Directed group × stimulus interaction (CS– and CSU)
 Caudate, nucleus accumbens (R) 0.051 20 5.00 6 4 −6
Directed group × stimulus interaction (CSE and CSU)
 Middle temporal gyrus (L) 0.002 152 4.80 −56 −40 −2
 Amygdala, olfactory cortex (R) 0.038 40 3.86 26 6 −18
Post‐hoc: REMD > control (CSE)
 Middle temporal gyrus (L) 0.005 94 7.79 −62 −40 2
 Middle occipital gyrus (R) 0.010 111 7.69 48 −80 6
 Sup/middle occipital gyrus (L) 0.022 76 7.09 −36 −90 16
 Sup/middle occipital gyrus (L) 0.011 80 6.82 −26 −76 34
 Lateral orbitofrontal cortex (L) 0.058 10 5.42 −36 30 −12
Post‐hoc: REMD > control (CS –)
 Inf/middle temporal gyrus (L) 0.004 169 9.46 −46 −60 −2
 Sup/middle frontal gyrus (L) 0.019 95 7.40 −20 8 60
 Amygdala, hippocampus, pallidum (L) 0.024 31 6.90 −18 −4 −14
 Sup/middle frontal gyrus (R) 0.003 130 6.52 30 0 60
 Putamen (L) 0.093 19 5.65 −28 −12 0

P corr stands for nonstationary, whole brain corrected cluster P‐values, k for the cluster size, t peak for the t‐value of the peak‐voxel (F for F‐value), Inf for inferior, Sup for superior, [x, y, and z] coordinates are in MNI‐space. Post‐hoc contrasts were computed with sleep restriction, S2 amount and S4 amount as covariates. There were no significant clusters of activation at the employed threshold in other post‐hoc contrasts. The cluster in the amygdala and hippocampus was noted also for the CSE (left, P corr = 0.156, and right, P corr = 0.166) and for the CSU (left, P corr = 0.174).