Skip to main content
. 2011 Mar 9;33(3):628–638. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21227

Table I.

Demographic data and the gray‐matter volume from both groups

Group Subject Sex Age (year) 2‐pd (ph/nph) Gray‐matter volume in (arbitrary unit)
Lesioned S1 Nonlesioned S1 Lesioned S2 Nonlesioned S2
MCA 1 F 16 2.5/0.15 5031.49 8666.69 0.01 1945.67
2 M 20 8.5/0.1 7443.46 10563.55 1479.94 2515.38
3 F 19 4.4/0.2 2713.52 6646.25 8.47 1686.59
4 M 30 4.3/0.4 3366.29 7944.18 154.31 2294.21
5 M 12 6/0.5 8107.55 9948.02 1734.22 2246.88
6 F 11 1.2/0.2 8142.90 9108.94 2004.99 2342.82
Median 17.5 4.35/0.20 6237.00 8888.00 817.10 2271.00
PL 1 F 11 0.4/0.2 7797.20 8571.45 1657.78 2397.10
2 M 12 0.3/0.2 8702.29 12207.24 2265.37 3085.72
3 F 21 0.6/0.1 9472.77 10167.99 2172.89 2384.52
4 M 12 0.7/0.4 7854.38 10709.32 2065.25 2750.57
5 M 19 0.3/0.1 6084.03 8403.59 1563.29 2452.96
6 M 16 0.5/0.3 9834.86 11781.63 2284.49 2740.93
7 F 30 0.8/0.5 6007.95 7505.73 1641.81 2047.01
8 M 11 1.5/0.4 8827.45 10181.99 1990.51 2182.12
Median 14 0.55/0.25 8278.00 10170.00 2028.00 2425.00
P 0.63 0.66 0.001*/0.85 0.08 0.28 0.03* 0.11

Comparison between the two groups (χ2‐test for gender, Mann–Whitney U test for all other variables). Subject numbers correspond to Figure 1. ph/nph, paretic hand/nonparetic hand. *Statistically significant (P < 0.05)..