Skip to main content
. 2010 May 13;32(3):480–493. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21033

Table II.

Summary of neuropsychological assessment

Domain test Patients (C+; n = 14) Healthy controls (HC; n = 15) Impaired patients (IC+; n = 7) Difference C+ vs. HC (t test or M‐U) Difference IC+ vs. HC (t test or M‐U)
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD P value P value
Attention and concentration
 Attention Bourdon‐Wiersma avg/row (s) 12.56 3.09 10.61 1.32 13.7 3.56 0.023 0.0018
 Every day attention—auditory elevator TEA ST5 5.44 3.58 7.86 2.21 3.2 2.91 0.015 0.0002
Cognitive/psychomotor speed
 Trail making test A (s) 28.09 9.52 22.23 3.66 32.8 9.67 0.025 0.0006
 Nine‐hole pegboard, Nondominant hand (s) 20.26 2.73 17.94 1.31 21.1 2.65 0.004 0.0005
 WAIS digit symbol 58.56 14.17 67.41 11.01 49.9 10.95 0.053 0.0004
Self reported cognitive complaints: CQF
 Distraction 11.2 4.9 9.1 2.1 12.8 4.5 0.06 0.02
 Distraction in social situations 6.1 2.2 6.4 1.8 7.3 1.9 0.35 0.25
 Names and words 4.8 2.2 5.8 2.1 4.8 2.6 0.11 0.18
 Orientation 6.2 1.5 5.7 1.5 6.8 1.9 0.22 0.06
 Total score 36.7 13.6 35.2 7.5 42.0 12.3 0.35 0.09

All units are arbitrary, except specified otherwise. C+: chemotherapy‐treated patients; HC: healthy controls; IC: impaired patients, defined as C+ patients having more than two cognitive tests outside normal variance (>2 standard deviation (SD) difference from mean of controls).

Note: Higher scores on TEA‐ST5 and WAIS digit symbol and lower scores on Bourdon‐Wiersma, Nine‐hole Peg and Trail Making Test indicate better performance.