Table II.
Group differences in brain activation
pFWE‐corr clustel | MNI | T at voxel | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group comparisons | level | Voxels | x | y | z | level | Side | Brain region |
FEP < HC | 0.0001 | 3,586 | 2 | −56 | 46 | 4.92 | R, L | PCu extending into SPL and cuneus (BA 7) |
−18 | −56 | 62 | ||||||
−6 | −62 | 52 | ||||||
0.0001 | 949 | −12 | 2 | 62 | 4.62 | L | SFG and MFG (BA 6) | |
−34 | 2 | 54 | ||||||
−20 | 14 | 52 | ||||||
0.109 | 207 | 26 | 20 | 48 | 3.25 | R | MFG and SFG (BA 6, 8)a,b | |
(0.024) | 36 | 14 | 50 | |||||
24 | 18 | 56 | ||||||
FEP < ARMS‐LT | 0.0001 | 1,568 | −32 | 34 | 0 | 4.54 | L | IFG, insula, and OFG (BA 47,13)b |
−26 | 22 | −4 | ||||||
−26 | 28 | 4 | ||||||
0.006 | 402 | −14 | 0 | 60 | 3.97 | L | SFG (BA 6) | |
−18 | −2 | 72 | ||||||
−10 | 16 | 64 | ||||||
0.0001 | 689 | −34 | 26 | 18 | 3.55 | L | IFG and MFG (BA 13, 10, 8)b | |
−36 | 50 | 14 | ||||||
−48 | 16 | 46 | ||||||
0.006 | 406 | 26 | 22 | 2 | 3.82 | R | IFG extending into insula (BA 47)a | |
(n.s.) | 30 | 34 | −2 | |||||
34 | 24 | 14 | ||||||
ARMS‐ST < HC | 0.0001 | 2,738 | −8 | −64 | 48 | 4.82 | L, R | SPL, Pcu (BA 7) |
4 | −56 | 46 | ||||||
−22 | −78 | 40 | ||||||
0.022 | 312 | −12 | 0 | 62 | 3.81 | L | SFG (BA 6, 32) | |
−14 | 10 | 52 | ||||||
0.0001 | 741 | 48 | −44 | 52 | 3.20 | R | IPL and SPL (BA 40, 7) | |
52 | −44 | 44 | ||||||
36 | −64 | 60 | ||||||
ARMS‐ST < ARMS‐LT | 0.025 | 303 | 42 | 18 | −4 | 3.69 | R | Insula and IFG (BA 47, 13)a |
(0.056) | 34 | 34 | −2 | |||||
26 | 22 | −2 | ||||||
0.077 | 229 | −10 | −4 | 66 | 3.52 | L | SFG (BA 6)a,b | |
(0.023) | −18 | −4 | 70 | |||||
0.083 | 224 | −38 | 14 | 0 | 3.51 | L | Insula (BA 13, 47)a | |
(0.039) | −26 | 20 | −4 | |||||
−28 | 20 | 6 | ||||||
0.062 | 243 | 18 | −78 | 48 | 3.50 | R, L | Pcu (BA 9, 17) | |
28 | −82 | 36 | ||||||
−2 | −74 | 54 |
Brain activation differences calculated using ANCOVA analyses in BPM of 2‐back > 0‐back contrast with two non‐imaging covariates (gender, age) and one imaging covariate VBM‐GM. There were no significant differences in contrasts: FEP > HC, ARMS‐ST > HC, ARMS‐LT < HC, ARMS‐LT > HC, ARMS‐ST > ARMS‐LT, FEP < ARMS‐ST, FEP > ARMS‐ST, FEP > ARMS‐LT. Two clusters (indicated with “b”) lost its significance after exclusion of 10 medicated patients from our FEP < ARMS‐LT analysis. There was one big subcortical cluster that became significant encompassing the left subthalamic and lentiform nucleus (MNI x, y, z: −10, −14, −6; 1143 voxels; P = 0.0001, FWE corrected) and two smaller ones in the right middle and the superior frontal gyrus (42, −46, 2; 324 voxels; P = 0.017, FWE corrected) and in the left inferior parietal lobule (−32, −44, 50; 299 voxels; P = 0.024, FWE corrected).
Abbreviations: ARMS‐ST, short‐term ARMS; ARMS‐LT, long‐term ARMS; BA, Brodman area; FEP, first‐episode psychosis; FG, frontal gyrus; HC, healthy controls; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; Pcu, Precuneus; n.s., nonsignificant; OFG, orbital frontal gyrus; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; SPL, superior parietal lobule.
aCluster changed its significance after covarying for GMV (P value without VBM–GMV imaging covariate in parentheses).
bCluster lost its significance after exclusion of medicated individuals (8 FEP, 2 ARMS‐LT).