Skip to main content
. 2011 Nov 11;34(2):347–355. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21443

Table II.

Task‐by‐TMS condition interaction effects

MNI coordinates
Region Side BA x y z z‐score Cluster size
Planning vs. baseline, sham rTMS > real rTMS
Premotor cortex L 6 −38 −2 50 3.76 41
L 9 −46 2 32 3.25 4
Dorsolateral PFC L 46 −42 16 18 3.19 2
L 46 −54 16 30 3.25 5
Anterior PFC R 10 26 52 20 3.14 4
L 6 −12 42 44 3.18 4
Ventrolateral PFC R 45 50 38 0 3.20 5
Precuneus bil. 7 −8 −54 70 4.00 41
bil. 7/31 −4 −46 46 3.29 19
R 7 8 −54 56 3.31 4
Cuneus R 31 14 −82 30 3.47 25
Inferior parietal cortex L 40 −48 −60 40 3.26 22
Planning vs. baseline, real rTMS > sham rTMS
No significant results
Task load effects, sham rTMS > real rTMS
Superior parietal cortex R 40 44 −52 44 3.12 1
Premotor cortex L 6 −40 0 24 3.11 1
Task load effects, real rTMS > sham rTMS
No significant results

Task × rTMS condition interaction effects for planning versus baseline and task load effects; all brain regions with a statistical significance of P < 0.001 uncorrected for multiple comparisons are presented.

rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; BA, Brodmann area; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; PFC, prefrontal cortex.