Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan 26;30(9):2879–2889. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20715

Table II.

Foci of significant rCBF increase during chopstick compared to finger prehension

Regional of rCBF increase (BA) Side MNI image coordinates of peak activation Z score of peak activation r‐value
x y z Performance errors Reach‐lift period
Primary sensory area (2.3) L −56 −16 30 5.65 0.13 −0.10
Dorsal premotor area (6) L −32 −4 44 5.41 0.27 0.01
(6) L −40 −6 44 5.14 −0.09 0.16
(6) R 22 −6 58 5.03 0.38 0.24
Ventral premotor area (6) L −60 4 32 5.28 −0.32 0.27
(6) L −58 2 36 4.95 −0.13 0.17
Superior parietal lobule (7) L −14 −70 54 5.34 −0.16 0.07
(7) L −16 −76 52 5.00 −0.17 −0.26
(7) R 22 −64 70 5.38 −0.06 −0.29
(7) R 18 −66 70 5.35 0.01 −0.63*
Posterior intraparietal area (7) R 32 −64 64 5.30 −0.61* −0.03
(7) R 12 −70 48 4.93 −0.20 −0.20
Middle temporal gyrus (37) L −40 −72 0 4.89 0.43 0.02
Secondary visual area (18) R 34 −88 −2 5.88 0.65* 0.07
(18) R 32 −86 −6 5.43 0.71* 0.18
(18) R 26 −100 0 5.36 −0.16 0.38
(18) R 26 −102 4 5.34 0.15 0.41
(19) R 36 −88 4 5.01 −0.11 −0.35
Dentate nucleus L −18 −46 −24 5.37 0.47 0.01
Cerebellar hemisphere L −28 −58 −36 6.07 0.45 0.28
L −22 −72 −28 5.05 0.33 0.29
L −26 −44 −44 5.02 0.42 −0.17

The areas of significant activation were determined by the exclusive masking analysis (corrected P < 0.05). The r‐values indicate correlation coefficients computed between the magnitude of rCBF and the number of performance errors, and the rCBF magnitude and reach‐lift period.

*

P < 0.05.