Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 19;30(2):392–402. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20512

Table III.

Individual Bayes Factors, Group Bayes Factors (GBF), and Positive Evidence Ratios (PER) for the comparison of Models #1–3.

Subject Model 1 vs. 2 Model 1 vs. 3 Model 2 vs. 3 Model 1 vs. 4
1 1.03E+000 7.04E+000 7.25E+000 1.00E+000
2 3.20E−008 1.31E−004 1.83E+001 8.30E−001
3 4.10E−001 7.28E+000 3.01E+000 1.01E+000
4 4.41E+000 5.12E+000 1.02E+000
6 1.71E+001 5.01E+004 8.56E+005 5.50E+002
7 9.50E−001 6.68E+000 6.35E+000 1.07E+000
8 4.70E−001 2.06E+000
9 8.50E−001 7.38E+000 6.31E+000 9.70E−001
10 3.50E+000 7.17E+000 6.80E−001
11 1.05E+000 6.20E+000 6.50E+000 1.24E+000
12 7.24E+000 7.33E+000 5.35E+000
13 9.70E−001 7.39E+000 7.15E+000 9.80E−001
14 1.03E−010 3.85E−011 4.29E+001
16 8.80E−001 7.39E+000 6.52E+000 9.60E−001
PER 4:2 11:2 9:0 3:0
GBF 9.00E−016 5.79E−002 4.15E+012 1.83E+005
GBF w/o subj. 2,14 2.74E+002 1.15E+013 2.27E+011 5.13E+003

Bayes Factors smaller than 1 indicate that there is positive evidence for the second model in the comparison. Bold print indicates significant evidence for the first model in a comparison, italics indicate significant evidence for the second model (but see the comments in the text). Regular print is used for comparisons that yielded consistent but nonsignificant evidence for one of the two models. If no value is provided (—), the model comparison did not yield consistent evidence for either model. Consequently, no Bayes Factor could be calculated.