Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 19;30(3):776–788. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20545

Table I.

Demographic data from both groups

Group Subj.# Sex Age [yr] Lesion side [L/R] M1 [TMS] S1 [MEG] 2PD [ph/nph] VIB [ph/nph] Motor dysfunction [0–4]
CONTRAMCA 1 F 16 L contra contra 2.5/0.15 8/8 2
2 F 19 L contra contra 4.4/0.2 6/8 3
3 M 20 R contra contra 8.5/0.1 4/8 2
4 M 12 L contra contra 6/0.5 4/8 2
5 M 30 R contra contra 4.3/0.4 4/6 3
6 F 11 L contra contra 1.2/0.2 8/8 2
IPSIPL 1 F 11 R ipsi contra 0.4/0.2 7.5/8 2
2 F 21 L ipsi contra 0.6/0.1 7.5/8 2
3 M 19 R ipsi contra 0.3/0.1 8/8 2
4 F 30 L ipsi contra 0.8/0.5 8/8 2
5 M 12 R ipsi contra 0.3/0.2 8/8 2
6 M 12 L ipsi contra 0.7/0.4 8/8 2
7 M 16 R ipsi contra 0.5/0.3 8/8 2
8 M 11 L ipsi contra 1.5/0.4 8/8 2

Patient numbers correspond to those in Figure 1; see text for details. Yr, year; L/R, left, right; ph/nph, paretic hand, nonparetic hand.