Skip to main content
. 2007 Dec 6;30(2):355–368. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20511

Table III.

Volume data (Mean, SD) for each of the ROI measured at each site in the five subjects, and using T1 and T2 tissue segmentation

GE_1 GE_2 PHILIPS SIEMENS_1 SIEMENS_2 Intersite CV
Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD Mean SD
Frontal (cc) 308.5 24.1 311.6 25.1 301.9 21.5 322.7 25.3 326.6 22.9
 GM (%) 42.0 2.1 41.5 1.9 42.5 1.8 41.5 1.0 42.9 1.7 2.2
 WM (%) 32.8 1.9 32.8 2.5 33.5 2.5 35.2 2.7 32.9 2.1 5.4
 CSF (%) 22.6 2.0 23.1 3.1 21.4 2.7 21.1 2.9 22.4 2.6 7.0
Temporal (cc) 236.9 21.9 241.4 23.7 240.7 20.3 240.4 15.6 239.9 21.4
 GM (%) 60.8 1.7 58.7 1.5 59.8 0.8 60.3 1.0 59.8 1.5 2.0
 WM (%) 24.6 0.9 25.9 1.0 26.7 1.0 25.9 1.8 26.9 2.0 4.9
 CSF (%) 14.6 1.0 15.4 1.4 13.5 0.8 13.8 2.0 13.3 1.3 8.3
Parietal (cc) 271.7 20.4 274.6 21.4 271.6 13.9 280.8 17.6 287.6 20.0
 GM (%) 38.5 3.9 39.0 2.3 37.7 1.3 38.5 1.5 40.3 2.1 4.3
 WM (%)a 40.9 3.0 39.1 2.6 42.0 2.4 42.1 2.9 35.9 2.1 7.2
 CSF (%) 19.2 3.0 20.5 3.7 18.9 2.0 18.1 2.6 22.6 2.6 10.1
Occipital (cc) 124.2 8.0 125.4 6.9 129.3 6.6 132.7 9.9 132.3 7.3
 GM (%) 52.9 5.4 53.3 3.0 50.7 1.5 51.7 1.7 54.3 3.6 5.7
 WM (%)a 33.5 3.9 32.2 1.5 36.9 1.6 35.6 2.0 28.6 4.4 11.7
 CSF (%) 13.6 3.6 14.5 3.9 12.4 1.7 12.7 2.5 17.1 4.3 17.3

Intersite CV: average of within subject coefficients of variation between scanners (see Methods).

ROIs were measured bilaterally, adding right and left values.

a

ROIs showing significant intersite differences in an ANOVA (P < 0.05). If the ANOVA was significant, the pair of extreme values showing significant differences is boldfaced (P < 0.05; Sidak test).