Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 22;30(11):3574–3595. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20780

Table VIII.

Result from post‐hoc Tukey Kramer HSD test for kappa (κ) values from raters and all warping techniques for all test structures

Globus pallidus Striatum Thalamus
Method Groups Mean ± SD (range) Groups Mean ± SD (range) Groups Mean ± SD (range)
Manual raters A 0.587 ± 0.133 (0.319–0.839) A 0.809 ± 0.047 (0.693–0.895) A 0.829 ± 0.047 (0.675–0.907)
LSQ9 B 0.530 ± 0.071 (0.359–0.668) C 0.630 ± 0.093 (0.533–0.810) C 0.745 ± 0.044 (0.680–0.836)
LSQ12 B 0.545 ± 0.075 (0.344–0.668) C 0.658 ± 0.077 (0.455–0.823) C 0.748 ± 0.046 (0.6650.838)
Talairach C 0.389 ± 0.122 (0.206–0.679) D 0.482 ± 0.121 (0.3950.683) D 0.643 ± 0.133 (0.3350.822)
PFA C 0.369 ± 0.132 (0.319–0.839) D 0.404 ± 0.136 (0.3000.708) D 0.649 ± 0.114 (0.3580.786)
SPM B 0.513 ± 0.112 (0.211–0.686) C 0.665 ± 0.121 (0.4430.813) C 0.736 ± 0.066 (0.6260.852)
Romeo B 0.532 ± 0.125 (0.268–0.718) C 0.668 ± 0.134 (0.4300.860) C 0.749 ± 0.113 (0.4770.871)
ANIMAL–1 A 0.547 ± 0.086 (0.380–0.702) B 0.732 ± 0.051 (0.6120.842) B 0.787 ± 0.040 (0.6780.845)
ANIMAL–2 A 0.573 ± 0.090 (0.418–0.749) B 0.754 ± 0.049 (0.6510.855) A, B 0.818 ± 0.034 (0.6890.861)

Techniques are grouped based on the result of Tukey Kramer HSD post‐hoc analysis (P < 0.05). The mean, minimum, maximum, and standard deviations of the kappas are also provided.