Table I.

Bayesian factors from the comparison of the different dynamic causal models (DCM) tested in healthy controls and pediatric MS patients

	Healthy subjects	Pediatric MS patients
L SMC model vs. R cerebellum model vs. vice versa	1.02 × 1029 vs. 2.54 × 10−13	9.24 × 108 vs. 1.93 × 104
L SMC model vs. L insula model vs. vice versa	3.73 × 1090 vs. 1.16 × 10−24	1.00 × 1033 vs. 3.60 × 10−22
L SMC model vs. R SII model vs. vice versa	3.77 × 1038 vs. 2.08 × 10−26	6.50 × 1029 vs. 1.50 × 10−18
L SMC model vs. L SII model vs. vice versa	6.22 × 1036 vs. 4.57 × 10−24	4.10 × 1027 vs. 3.10 × 10−20
L SMC model vs. SMA model vs. vice versa	1.07 × 1030 vs. 3.41 × 10−24	8.41 × 1036 vs. 1.4 × 10−25
L SMC model vs. R SMC model vs. vice versa	1.08 × 1057 vs. 5.61 × 10−28	1.20 × 1035 vs. 3.11 × 10−13
L SMC model vs. L thalamus model vs. vice versa	8.95 × 10103 vs. 1.55 × 10−24	9.06 × 1085 vs. 5.03 × 10−14

L, left; R, right; SMC, primary sensorimotor cortex; SMA, supplementary motor area; SII, secondary sensorimotor cortex.