Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 31;30(9):2789–2803. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20709

Table X.

Main effect of the Stroop interference versus neutral condition (n = 32a; one‐sample t‐test; P corrected < 0.05, k ≥ 20)

Anatomical location Side Cluster size MNI t‐value
x y z
Inferior frontal gyrus (100%) R 47 42 18 −6 6.82
Inferior frontal gyrus (84%) R 31 54 20 30 6.84
Middle frontal gyrus (13%) R
Inferior frontal gyrus (14%) R 135 42 16 36 8.39
Middle frontal gyrus (81%) R
Middle frontal gyrus (39%) L 61 −44 16 32 6.75
Superior frontal gyrus (95%) L + R 37 −8 10 58 8.56
Medial superior frontal gyrus (5%) L
Inferior parietal lobule (46%) R 87 30 −66 46 8.36
Superior parietal lobule (49%) R
Precuneus (76%) L + R 46 2 −70 54 6.76
Superior parietal lobule (2%) R
Cuneus (33%) L 42 −30 −78 24 7.37
Precuneus (12%) L
Precuneus (32%) L 44 −28 −66 32 8.45

Anatomical location (and the percentage of activated voxels within the anatomical area), cluster sizes (number of voxels), MNI coordinates (x, y, and z) and statistical t‐values of areas of significant activation for the main effect of the Stroop interference versus neutral condition.

L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.

a

The Stroop task was not performed in one control subject.