Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 31;30(9):2789–2803. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20709

Table VI.

Main effect of the 2‐back versus 0‐back condition (n = 32a; one‐sample t‐test; P corrected < 0.05, k ≥ 20)

Anatomical location Side Cluster size MNI t‐value
x y z
Precentral gyrus (6%) R 1387 28 0 62 8.60
Inferior frontal gyrus (8%) R
Middle frontal gyrus (76%) R
Precentral gyrus (9%) L 1161 −46 12 34 8.36
Inferior frontal gyrus (16%) L
Middle frontal gyrus (65%) L
Anterior cingulate gyrus (4%) L + R 566 2 18 52 8.61
Medial superior frontal gyrus (47%) L + R
Superior frontal gyrus (31%) L + R
Insula (29%) R 111 32 22 4 6.74
Inferior frontal gyrus (47%) R
Insula (31%) L 35 −34 24 0 6.13
Inferior frontal gyrus (40%) L
Supramarginal gyrus (11%) R 1465 46 −44 46 9.65
Inferior parietal lobule (51%) R
Superior parietal lobule (12%) R
Precuneus (14%) R
Precuneus (84%) R 79 4 −68 50 6.21
Superior parietal lobule (6%) R
Supramarginal gyrus (4%) L 1055 −32 −64 42 9.50
Inferior parietal lobule (41%) L
Superior parietal lobule (21%) L
Precuneus (13%) L

Anatomical location (and the percentage of activated voxels within the anatomical area), cluster sizes (number of voxels), MNI coordinates (x, y, and z) and statistical t‐values of areas of significant activation for the main effect of the 2‐back versus 0‐back condition.

L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.

a

The n‐back task was not performed in one control subject.