Skip to main content
. 2008 Dec 31;30(9):2789–2803. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20709

Table VIII.

Main effect of the 2‐back versus 1‐back condition (n = 32a; one‐sample t‐test; P corrected < 0.05, k ≥ 20)

Anatomical location Side Cluster size MNI t‐value
x y z
Middle frontal gyrus (46%) R 83 24 −4 54 5.96
Superior frontal gyrus (5%) R
Superior frontal gyrus (82%) L 44 −4 16 54 5.77
Medial superior frontal gyrus (16%) L
Inferior parietal lobule (21%) R 85 30 −54 38 6.51
Supramarginal gyrus (6%) R
Precuneus (87%) R 91 32 −72 38 6.45
Superior parietal lobule (5%) R
Inferior parietal lobule (65%) L 48 −36 −56 40 5.57
Supramarginal gyrus (10%) L
Precuneus (61%) L 75 −26 −68 42 5.85
Superior parietal lobule (32%) L

Anatomical location (and the percentage of activated voxels within the anatomical area), cluster sizes (number of voxels), MNI coordinates (x, y, and z) and statistical t‐values of areas of significant activation for the main effect of the 2‐back versus 1‐back condition.

L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute.

a

The n‐back task was not performed in one control subject.