Table II.
Statistical analysis on source positions and reactivity
| Subjects | Position (mm) | P | Reactivity | P | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sources | x | y | z | RL | RT | RM | ||||
| FSL (FCL) | FCT | 11 | 6 ± 12 | −4 ± 14 | 14 ± 9 | 0.002 | 10.8 ± 4.8 | −5.1 ± 3.9 | 5.8 ± 11.1 | <0.0001 |
| FST | 15 | 5 ± 13 | −4 ± 14 | 9 ± 12 | 0.003 | 6.3 ± 4.1 | −5.7 ± 3 | 0.4 ± 6.2 | <0.0001 | |
| ICL | ICT | 6 | 5 ± 17 | −7 ± 37 | 18 ± 21 | 0.2 | 5 ± 4.9 | −1.8 ± 7 | 0.3 ± 19 | >0.5 |
| ICT;L | ICT a | 9;6 | 2 ± 7 | −9 ± 14 | 18 ± 8 | >0.1 | 5.3 ± 2.3 | 1.1 ± 2.5 | 5.6 ± 7.7 | >0.1 |
| ICL a | 9;6 | 3 ± 7 | −2 ± 14 | 0 ± 8 | >0.1 | 0.4 ± 2.3 | 2.9 ± 2.4 | 5.3 ± 7.7 | >0.1 | |
| M20L | M20T | 12 | 9 ± 8 | −2 ± 13 | 9 ± 8 | 0.001 | ||||
| M30L | M30T | 11 | 3 ± 5 | 0 ± 11 | 10 ± 8 | 0.03 | ||||
Values are mean ± SD differences in sources ECDs coordinates and evoked activity indexes RT, RL and RM. Difference in position for M20L versus M20T and M30L versus M30T are also reported. Results of GLM models evaluating contrasts between sources in position and reactivity across subjects are summarized in the corresponding P value columns (Pillai's trace within‐subject effect).
a
Indicates different groups of subjects tested in the fastICA case (ANOVA test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons).