Skip to main content
. 2006 Nov 1;28(9):817–834. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20311

Table IV.

Results of the PCA carried out across voxels located in two different areas of the visual system

Cluster ID Regions included Total number of voxels % variance first PC % variance second PC % variance third PC % variance fourth PC Ratio 1* Ratio 2**
1a V1, V5/MT 20 26.75 11.68 7.15 6.31 3.33 5.39
2a V1, V5/MT 24 21.01 13.06 7.79 6.78 1.51 5.22
3a V1, V5/MT 10 25.65 17.78 10.97 9.81 1.16 5.87
4a V1, V5/MT 22 19.95 13.11 7.42 6.93 1.20 11.61
5b V2/3, V5/MT 20 29.00 10.34 8.83 6.56 12.36
6b V2/3, V5/MT 24 19.49 9.09 7.73 7.55 7.65
7b V2/3, V5/MT 17 22.91 11.35 10.47 9.05 13.14
8b V1, V2/3 16 24.42 11.89 9.83 8.16 6.08
9b V1, V2/3 18 29.47 10.20 7.73 6.84 7.80
*

Ratio difference in explained variance between the first PC pair and the second PC pair.

**

Ratio difference in explained variance between the second PC pair and the third PC pair.

a

Two‐component solution.

b

One‐component solution.