Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 21;5(1):183–195. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-18-00012.1

Table 2.

Comparison of Merkel cell carcinoma lesion dosimetry for patients A and B.a

Patientb
NRT dose (Gy)
Equivalent XRT dosec (Gy)
n
Total
Fraction size
RBEc
Total
Fraction Size
EQD2
In-field dosimetry
 * 1 2.52 2.52 3.2 8.00 8.00 17.6
 * 1 10.58 10.58 2.8 30.00 30.00 198.0
 A 2 6.00 3.00 3.1 18.67 9.34 46.1
 * 3 7.57 2.52 3.2 24.00 8.00 52.8
 B 8 16.00 2.00 3.3 52.22 6.53 99.5
 B 10 18.00 1.80 3.3 59.56 5.96 106.7
 * 10 8.04 0.80 3.7 30.00 3.00 36.0
 B 12 18.00 1.50 3.4 61.07 5.09 98.8
 * 16 18.40 1.15 3.5 64.91 4.06 91.6
Out-of-field dosimetry
 A 2 0.32 0.16 4.7 1.51 0.75 1.1
 A 2 0.44 0.22 4.5 1.99 1.00 1.6
 A 2 1.00 0.50 4.0 4.02 2.01 4.0
 A 2 1.98 0.99 3.6 7.15 3.57 9.4

Abbreviations: NRT, neutron radiation therapy; RBE, relative biological effectiveness; XRT, x-ray radiation therapy; EQD2, equivalent dose at 2 Gy.

a

Patient A was treated with 2 × 3 neutron-Gy (in-field), and patient B was treated with 8 to 12 fractions for a total of 16 to 18 Gy.

b

To provide additional clinical context, equivalent XRT and NRT doses are also listed for alternative treatment schedules (Patient *).

c

Estimates of neutron RBE and equivalent XRT dose are for (α/β) = 3 Gy.