Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cogn Sci. 2019 Nov;43(11):e12792. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12792

Table 4a-d.

Counts of participants’ responses for each of the different conditions in Experiment 4 (Causal judgments Table 4a-b, relevance judgments Table 4c-d) and for each of the different Norm violation conditions (rows). The responses for the norm violating entity are highlighted in bold.

Table 4a. Agents condition causal judgments
Norm condition: Admin only Neither Both Prof only
Immoral 1 0 7 36
Malfunction 6 0 9 30
No violation 8 0 26 4
Table 4b. Artifacts condition causal judgments
Norm condition: Black lever only Neither Both Red lever only
Immoral 7 1 18 20
Malfunction 0 0 2 38
No violation 6 8 24 7
Table 4c. Agents condition counterfactual relevance judgments
Norm condition: Admin only Neither Both Prof only
Immoral 2 2 12 28
Malfunction 6 10 13 16
No violation 6 10 21 1
Table 4d. Artifacts condition counterfactual relevance judgments
Norm condition: Black lever only Neither Both Red lever only
Immoral 3 18 16 9
Malfunction 1 1 10 28
No violation 1 24 18 2