Table V.
Anatomical region | BA | x | y | z | ALE (× 10−2) | Volume (mm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anterior cingulate | 32 | 1 | 16 | 38 | 2.4 | 4,288 |
Pooled | ||||||
L inferior frontal junction | 6/9 | −44 | 5 | 33 | 1.9 | 1,680 |
L inferior parietal lobule | 40 | −40 | −50 | 45 | 1.8 | 992 |
L inferior frontal gyrus | 45 | −42 | 23 | 10 | 1.4 | 744 |
L inferior frontal gyrus | 44 | −48 | 9 | 11 | 1.7 | 696 |
L precuneus | 7 | −21 | −71 | 36 | 1.3 | 552 |
R inferior frontal junction | 6/9 | 46 | 9 | 28 | 1.6 | 448 |
L anterior cingulate gyrus | 32 | −3 | 38 | 25 | 1.4 | 360 |
R insula | 13 | 36 | 12 | 7 | 1.2 | 312 |
R superior frontal gyrus | 10 | 20 | 48 | 23 | 1.3 | 272 |
L middle frontal gyrus | 9 | −42 | 30 | 31 | 1.3 | 200 |
L supramarginal gyrus | 40 | −45 | −42 | 36 | 1.3 | 192 |
L insula | 13 | −26 | 22 | 5 | 1.2 | 184 |
Verbal | ||||||
Anterior cingulate | 32 | 0 | 17 | 35 | 2.0 | 3,200 |
L inferior frontal gyrus | 44 | −47 | 12 | 11 | 1.7 | 1152 |
R superior frontal gyrus | 10 | 20 | 48 | 23 | 1.3 | 520 |
L insula | 13 | −27 | 22 | 5 | 1.2 | 368 |
R insula | 13 | 36 | 10 | 8 | 1.1 | 352 |
R inferior frontal junction | 6/9 | 48 | 9 | 28 | 1.2 | 184 |
L inferior parietal lobule | 40 | −40 | −52 | 44 | 1.2 | 168 |
L inferior frontal junction | 6/9 | −46 | 8 | 35 | 1.1 | 112 |
Manual | ||||||
L inferior frontal junction | 6/9 | −43 | 4 | 35 | 1.2 | 2,136 |
Anterior cingulate | 32 | 3 | 16 | 41 | 1.3 | 960 |
L inferior parietal lobule | 40 | −47 | −40 | 47 | 1.2 | 792 |
L middle frontal gyrus | 46 | −34 | 21 | 24 | 1.3 | 648 |
L precuneus | 7 | −21 | −70 | 37 | 1.1 | 600 |
P < 0.01, all three meta‐analyses. In the pooled and verbal ALE meta‐analysis, the highest ALE values were found in the anterior cingulate gyrus. Meta‐analysis of the manual Stroop task showed strong results in the left inferior frontal junction. In the manual Stroop meta‐analysis, the peak observed in the anterior cingulate was much smaller than that seen in the verbal Stroop meta‐analysis. Each cluster listed above was observed with a peak P value of < 0.0002. Due to the method of statistical inference, it was not possible to assess the P value of the center of each cluster with any greater precision than P < 0.0002.
BA, Brodman area; ALE, activation likelihood estimation.