Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 21;25(1):6–21. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20129

Table V.

ALE meta‐analysis of the Stroop color–word task*

Anatomical region BA x y z ALE (× 10−2) Volume (mm3)
Anterior cingulate 32 1 16 38 2.4 4,288
Pooled
 L inferior frontal junction 6/9 −44 5 33 1.9 1,680
 L inferior parietal lobule 40 −40 −50 45 1.8 992
 L inferior frontal gyrus 45 −42 23 10 1.4 744
 L inferior frontal gyrus 44 −48 9 11 1.7 696
 L precuneus 7 −21 −71 36 1.3 552
 R inferior frontal junction 6/9 46 9 28 1.6 448
 L anterior cingulate gyrus 32 −3 38 25 1.4 360
 R insula 13 36 12 7 1.2 312
 R superior frontal gyrus 10 20 48 23 1.3 272
 L middle frontal gyrus 9 −42 30 31 1.3 200
 L supramarginal gyrus 40 −45 −42 36 1.3 192
 L insula 13 −26 22 5 1.2 184
Verbal
 Anterior cingulate 32 0 17 35 2.0 3,200
 L inferior frontal gyrus 44 −47 12 11 1.7 1152
 R superior frontal gyrus 10 20 48 23 1.3 520
 L insula 13 −27 22 5 1.2 368
 R insula 13 36 10 8 1.1 352
 R inferior frontal junction 6/9 48 9 28 1.2 184
 L inferior parietal lobule 40 −40 −52 44 1.2 168
 L inferior frontal junction 6/9 −46 8 35 1.1 112
Manual
 L inferior frontal junction 6/9 −43 4 35 1.2 2,136
 Anterior cingulate 32 3 16 41 1.3 960
 L inferior parietal lobule 40 −47 −40 47 1.2 792
 L middle frontal gyrus 46 −34 21 24 1.3 648
 L precuneus 7 −21 −70 37 1.1 600
*

P < 0.01, all three meta‐analyses. In the pooled and verbal ALE meta‐analysis, the highest ALE values were found in the anterior cingulate gyrus. Meta‐analysis of the manual Stroop task showed strong results in the left inferior frontal junction. In the manual Stroop meta‐analysis, the peak observed in the anterior cingulate was much smaller than that seen in the verbal Stroop meta‐analysis. Each cluster listed above was observed with a peak P value of < 0.0002. Due to the method of statistical inference, it was not possible to assess the P value of the center of each cluster with any greater precision than P < 0.0002.

BA, Brodman area; ALE, activation likelihood estimation.