Skip to main content
. 2000 Oct 16;11(4):249–260. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200012)11:4<249::AID-HBM20>3.0.CO;2-5

Figure 1.

Figure 1

False‐positive rates for three tests and three noise estimates vs. the nominal significance level for synthetic noise data. A: Test 1 (no assumed form). B: Test 2 (assumed peak values). C: Test 3 (assumed hemodynamic shape). In all tests, not estimating the noise parameters produced false‐positive rates significantly different from nominal values, although Test 2 was least sensitive. Values above the shaded region are inappropriately high, while values in the shaded region are too low.