Skip to main content
. 2000 Oct 16;11(4):249–260. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200012)11:4<249::AID-HBM20>3.0.CO;2-5

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Within‐test comparisons of receiver‐operating‐characteristics (ROCs) as a function of noise estimate for actual fMRI noise data with synthetic activation A: Test 1 (no assumed form). B: Test 2 (assumed three peak values). C: Test 3 (assumed shape). For Tests 1 and 3, the local noise estimate performs best, followed by the global estimate. Test 2 performance is least sensitive to the noise estimate.