Skip to main content
. 2000 Dec 13;12(2):79–93. doi: 10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<79::AID-HBM1005>3.0.CO;2-I

Table II.

CSM vs. SPM comparison for subject 1*

CSM SPM
P(corr.) t x,y,z(mm) P(corr.) t x,y,z(mm) dist(mm)
0.000 17.77 42.6 −32.9 −2.4 0.000 17.08 41.2 −33.8 −3.8 2.1
0.000 13.31 10.2 −36.3 26.9 0.000 13.45 11.2 −37.5 26.6 1.6
0.000 13.28 −28.3 −46.2 15.9 0.000 11.24 −30.0 −45.0 15.2 2.2
0.000 12.76 −42.6 −48.7 −28.8 0.000 8.98 −41.2 −48.8 −30.4 2.0
0.000 12.50 10.4 −15.0 13.0 0.000 9.99 11.2 −15.0 11.4 1.8
0.000 12.16 61.0 6.6 −7.5 0.000 10.75 60.0 7.5 −7.6 1.4
0.000 11.83 −33.4 6.6 −11.6 0.000 11.21 −33.8 7.5 −11.4 1.0
0.000 10.62 −52.8 −22.5 −15.4 0.000 10.25 −52.5 −22.5 −15.2 0.4
0.000 10.42 −13.8 −12.3 24.2 0.000 8.46 −15.0 −11.2 22.8 2.1
0.000 10.42 −1.4 −5.6 15.9 0.000 12.01 0.0 −3.8 15.2 2.4
0.000 10.11 −30.6 −66.5 −15.0 0.002 6.59 −30.0 −67.5 −15.2 1.1
0.000 9.94 18.6 −21.2 −25.5 0.000 7.59 18.8 −22.5 −26.6 1.7
0.000 9.39 −2.4 11.7 8.4 0.000 7.16 −3.8 11.2 7.6 1.7
0.000 9.20 −33.9 −32.5 15.0 0.000 10.07 −33.8 −33.8 15.2 1.3
0.000 7.87 31.7 42.2 11.1 0.004 6.34 30.0 41.2 11.4 1.9
*

SPM sensitivity at CSM maxima locations.