Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 15;10:1394. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01394

TABLE 4.

Performance development dependent on potential outcome-related predictors (stress, health sense, training hours, subjective health-related parameters, biochemical markers).

Health sense (%) ≥ 95 ≥90 to <95 ≥ 85 to <90 ≥80 to <85 <80
Performance Δ (%) 7.6 ± 10.3 4.8 ± 12.7 5.5 ± 10.2 2.9 ± 8.8 2.4 ± 11.2 =0.040#

Stress level (%) < 20 20 to <40 40 to <60 60 to <80 ≥80
Performance Δ (%) 7.1 ± 9.4 7.0 ± 11.0 3.3 ± 8.8 3.7 ± 11.5 1.8 ± 14.8 =0.045#

Hemoglobin (g/dl) m: ≥15.0 m: 14.3 to 14.9 m: ≤14.2
f: ≥13.9 f: 13.3 to 13.8 f: ≤13.2
Performance Δ (%) 5.1 ± 10.8 4.9 ± 12.8 4.2 ± 8.6 =0.772ns

hs-CRP (mg/dl) ≤0.026 0.027 to 0.058 ≥0.059
Performance Δ (%) 6.1 ± 8.8 5.3 ± 10.0 4.5 ± 11.8 =0.588ns

Vitamin D (ng/ml) > 20 ≤20
Performance Δ (%) 4.9 ± 11.6 5.4 ± 23.7 =0.578ns

EBV serostatus Negative Positive
Performance Δ (%) 5.4 ± 12.1 4.3 ± 9.8 =0.374ns

Training hours (Th/w) m: ≤9.0 m: 9.1 to 12.7 m: ≥12.8
f: ≤12.5 f: 12.6 to 15.4 f: ≥15.5
Performance Δ (%) m: 4.2 ± 9.7 m: 5.8 ± 10.9 m: 4.7 ± 12.3 =0.748ns
f: 4.8 ± 10.6 f: 6.2 ± 10.9 f: 1.2 ± 10.4 =0.092ns

m, male; f, female; Th/w, training hours per week; Δ = delta Paerob V1 vs. Paerob V2. Data are shown as mean ± SD and percentage values. #p < 0.05, nsp ≥ 0.05 (non-significant).