Skip to main content
. 2019 Oct 2;294(46):17314–17325. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010217

Table 2.

Summary of in vitro motility sliding velocities

Construct Velocity (nm/s)
EC50m) (n = 3) c
Buffer (n = 120)a DMSO (n = 90)b OM (n = 90) b DMSO (n = 90)c OM (n = 90) c
WT 1547 ± 19 1771 ± 46 8.0 ± 0.2d,e 1824 ± 26 9.9 ± 0.3d,e 0.074 ± 0.002
F764L 1300 ± 17d,f 1539 ± 24d,f 29.4 ± 0.8d,e,f 1733 ± 31f,g 44 ± 1.0d,e,f 0.246 ± 0.008d,f

a Four protein preparations at 0.24–0.4 μm density.

b Three protein preparations at 0.24 μm density with 20 mm KCl.

c Three protein preparations at 0.4 μm density with 100 mm KCl.

d p < 0.001.

e 10 μm OM condition compared to 0.1% DMSO.

f F764L compared to WT condition.

g p < 0.05.