Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;20:603. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3156-z

Table 2.

Comparison of ZINB regression with and without saturation adjustment, for artificially-depleted samples

Scenario Datasets compared Resampling ZINB (SA +) ZINB (SA )
1 (A1,A2) vs (B1,B2) 64 73 162
2 (A1,A2) vs (B1[50%],B2[50%]) 108 121 2668
3 (A1[50%],A2[50%]) vs (B1,B2) 17 112 1139
4 (A1[50%],A2[50%]) vs (B1[50%],B2[50%]) 8 30 37