Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 21;19:993. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4597-8

Table 3.

Comparative results of the numbers of spots and composition in three groups

Spot types LTBI Active TB infection Old TB infection χ2/P Z/P
ESAT-6 unique positive
 Cases 1281 270 69
 Composition rate 27.78 14.88 20.66 120.844/< 0.001
 Median spot number 12.00 20.00 16.00 57.080/< 0.001
 Spot number interquartile range 8.00,23.00 12.00,36.25 8.50,26.50
CFP-10 unique positive
 Cases 741 108 42
 Composition rate 16.07 5.96 12.57 116.473/< 0.001
 Median spot number 11.00 17.00 19.50 19.355/< 0.001
 Spot number interquartile range 7.00,20.00 9.00,31.75 7.00,32.25
ESAT-6 and CFP-10 double positive
 Cases 2590 1436 223
 Composition rate 56.15 79.16 66.77 297.397/< 0.001
 ESAT-6/median spot number 24.00 44.00 29.00 320.640/< 0.001
 ESAT-6/ Spot number interquartile range 12.00,46.00 24.00,80.00 14.00,60.00
CFP-10/ median spot number 24.00 46.00 26.00 320.728/< 0.001
CFP-10 (Spot number interquartile range) 12.00,47.00 23.00,89.00 15.00,54.00
Total spot number
 Cases 4612 1814 334
 Composition rate 100.00 100.00 100.00
 ESAT-6/ median spot number 15.00 36.00 20.00 635.730/< 0.001
 ESAT-6/(Spot number Interquartile range) 7.00,33.00 17.00,70.00 9.00,43.00
 CFP-10/median spot number 12.00 35.00 19.00 535.277/< 0.001
 CFP-10 (Spot number interquartile range) 4.00,30.00 11.00,75.00 6.00,40.25

TB: tuberculosis; LTBI: latent TB infection