Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2019 Nov 21;19:1137. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6347-0

Table 2.

Relationship between SNPs at rs6721961 and Nrf2 expression (n = 50)

	C/C at rs6721961 (n = 30)	C/A or A/A at rs6721961 (n = 20)	p value
Mutation (+) of Nrf2 (n = 5)	0	5	0.0543
No mutation of Nrf2 (n = 45)	30	15	0.0543
	Low in Nrf2 (n = 26)	High in Nrf2 (n = 24)	p value
Mutation (+) of Nrf2 (n = 5)	0	5	0.0184
No mutation of Nrf2 (n = 45)	26	19	0.0184
	Low in Nrf2 (n = 26)	High in Nrf2 (n = 24)	p value
C/C at rs6721961 (n = 30)	22	8	0.0005
C/A or A/A at rs6721961 (n = 20)	4	16	0.0005
	Mutation (+) of Nrf2 (n = 5)	No mutation of Nrf2 (n = 45)	p value
Mutation (+) of Keap1 (n = 11)	2	9	0.3057
No mutation of Keap12 (n = 39)	3	36	0.3057
	C/C at rs6721961 (n = 30)	C/A or A/A at rs6721961 (n = 20)	p value
Mutation (+) of Keap1 (n = 11)	7	4	0.7804
No mutation of Keap12 (n = 39)	23	16	0.7804
	Low in Nrf2 (n = 26)	High in Nrf2 (n = 24)	p value
Mutation (+) of Keap1 (n = 11)	4	7	0.3057
No mutation of Keap12 (n = 39)	22	17	0.3057