Table 2.
Trial | TSH before | TSH end | FT4 (ng/dl) before | FT4 end | T3 (ng/dl) before | T3 end | FT3 (pg/dl) before | FT3 end | T3 & ranges by sim | LT3 dose (μg) | LT4 dose (μg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High RTF (>20%) | |||||||||||
Appelhof T4 | 1.0 | 0.64 | 1.15 | 1.18 | 111 | 111 | – | – | – | ||
Appelhof T4 + T3 (10:1) | 1.1 | 0.35 | 1.15 | 1.02 | 109 | 119 | – | – | Med | 7.5 | 75 |
Appelhof T4 + T3 (5:1) | 1.0 | 0.07 | 1.18 | 1.00 | 115 | 143 | – | – | Med- | 12.5 | 75 |
Bunevicius, 2002, T4 | 1.02 | 0.45 | 1.61 | 1.64 | – | 227 | – | – | – | ||
Bunevicius, 2002, T4 + T3 | 1.02 | 0.47 | 1.61 | 0.96 | – | 247 | – | – | High | 10 | 65 |
Escobar-Morreale T4 | nl | 1.95 | – | 1.61 | – | – | – | 332 | – | ||
Escobar-Morreale T4 + T3 (5 μg) | nl | 2.56 | – | 1.31 | – | – | – | 325 | Med | 5 | 75 |
Escobar-Morreale T4 + T3 (7.5 μg) | nl | 1.09 | – | 1.34 | – | – | – | 384 | Med | 7.5 | 87.5 |
Siegmund T4 | 1.72 | 1.5 | 1.72 | 1.62 | – | – | 332 | 294 | - | ||
Siegmund T4 + T3 | 1.72 | 0.5 | 1.72 | 1.56 | – | – | 332 | 324 | Low- Med | 6.5 | 123 |
Medium RTF (10–20%) | |||||||||||
Clyde T4 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 96 | 87 | – | – | – | ||
Clyde T4 + T3 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.8 | 89 | 135 | – | – | Med | 15 | 86 |
Fadeyev T4 | – | 1.35 | – | 1.45 | – | – | – | 273 | |||
Fadeyev T4 + T3 | – | 1.7 | – | 0.96 | – | – | – | 267 | Med | 12.5 | 75 |
Kaminski T4 | 0.31 | 0.19 | 1.26 | 1.64 | 93 | 103 | – | – | – | ||
Kaminski T4 + T3 | 0.31 | 0.64 | 1.26 | 1.03 | 93 | 98 | – | – | Med -High | 15 | 75 |
Sawka T4 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.30 | 1.38 | – | – | 280 | 286 | – | ||
Sawka T4 + T3 | 1.75 | 1.8 | 1.22 | 0.82 | – | – | 267 | 306 | Med Low | 19 | 67 |
Rodriguez T4 | 1.7–1.8 | 2.5–2.9 | 76–79 | 73–86 | – | – | – | ||||
Rodriguez T4 + T3 | 1.7–1.8 | 3.3–7.6 | 76–79 | 95–104 | – | – | Med | 10 | 71 | ||
Low RTF (<10%) | |||||||||||
Bunevicius, 1999, T4 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 2.0 | 2.3/15.2 | – | 87 | – | – | – | ||
Bunevicius, 1999, T4 + T3 | 1. | 0.5 | 1.9 | 1.8/11.3 | – | 117 | – | – | High | 12.5 | 125 |
Nygaard* T4 | 1.1 | 0.99 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
Nygaard* T4+T3 | 1.1 | 0.76 | – | – | – | – | – | – | High Low | 20 | 77 |
Saravanan T4 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 1.62 | 1.57 | – | – | 248 | 234 | - | ||
Saravanan T4 + T3 | 0.85 | 1.25 | 1.64 | 1.14 | – | – | 248 | 239 | Med | 10 | 77 |
Walsh T4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.19 | 1.21 | – | – | 221 | 241 | - | ||
Walsh T4 + T3 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 1.19 | 0.89 | – | – | 221 | 228 | Low-Med | 10 | 86 |
Gray shading indicates T4/T3 arm of study,
study reports only free T4 index and FT3 index and does not report either total or free T4 or T3, blue font is total T4 levels in mcg/dL.
“T3 and T4 levels by sim” are the levels predicted by simulation for the combination therapy group, rather than measured T3 and T4 levels, and are categorized into 3 groups (high/medium/low). Mean/median LT3 and LT4 doses in the combination therapy group are also shown.