Table 2.
Unadjusted measures of relative association from three articles in the global health literature.
Exposure | Outcome | Unexposed group outcome proportion | Risk Ratioa | Odds Ratiob | Magnitude of odds ratio relative to risk ratioc | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Surviving Ebola virus [32] | Safe sexual behavior | 14% | 2.71 | 3.67 | 35% |
2 | Point-of-care testing [33] | Antibiotic use | 78% | 0.82 | 0.50 | 178% |
3 | Drinking [34] | Feelings of aggression | 20% | 3.1 | 6.7 | 116% |
a Risk ratio (for “exposed” vs. “unexposed”) computed directly from outcome proportions reported in the article as none of the three articles used the risk ratio as a measure of relative association.
b Odds ratio is obtained from unadjusted logistic regression [32] or directly from outcome proportions reported [33,34].
c In these examples where the outcome is relatively common (i.e., >10%), if the odds ratio were to be incorrectly interpreted as a risk ratio, this is the magnitude of overstatement of relative association.