Skip to main content
. 2019 Sep 11;3(11):e10226. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10226

Table 2.

Bone Mineralization Density Distribution of Trabecular and Cortical Bone From the Femur

6 Weeks 4 Months 18 Months Two‐way ANOVA (p values)
WT (n = 8 ) Shn3–/– (n = 8) WT (n = 6) Shn3–/– (n = 6) WT (n = 8) Shn3–/– (n = 8) inter‐action geno‐type Age
Trabecular Bone CaMean 22.30 22.63 22.41 25.24 a , d 23.10 24.88 a , d .004 <.001 <.001
(wt% Ca) (0.59) (1.16) (0.53) (0.60) (1.45) (0.73)
CaPeak 23.40 23.18 24.52 25.79 c , d 24.33 25.84 b , d .019 .003 <.001
(wt% Ca) (0.61) (1.27) (0.59) (0.77) (1.03) (0.71)
CaWidth 3.12 3.25 3.76 e 3.29 c 3.49 3.57 .035 .395 .005
(Δwt%Ca) (0.13) (0.43) (0.53) (0.16) (0.25) (0.21)
CaLow 9.38 8.81 11.43 3.52 a , d 7.98 h 4.04 a , d <.001 <.001 <.001
(% B.Ar) (1.62) (2.69) (2.23) (0.35) (3.15) (1.13)
Cortical Bone CaMean 23.94 23.99 25.55 e 25.88 d 26.27 d 27.08 d , h .420 .121 <.001
(wt% Ca) (1.04) (1.14) (0.69) (0.75) (0.43) (0.55)
CaPeak 24.87 24.57 26.23 e 26.51 d 26.82 d 27.49 d .215 .359 <.001
(wt% Ca) (0.86) (1.08) (0.77) (0.75) (0.43) (0.59)
CaWidth 3.01 3.01 2.92 3.18 c 3.03 3.70 a , d , g <.001 <.001 <.001
(Δwt%Ca) (0.16) (0.13) (0.53) (0.14) (0.13) (0.38)
CaLow 4.19 3.69 2.54 f 2.31 f 1.76 d 1.51 d .814 .430 <.001
(% B.Ar) (1.92) (1.07) (2.23) (0.33) (0.44) (0.42)

Data show mean (SD). n = number of studied animals. In bold: data that are significantly different to WT at similar age. Significance by Tukey post hoc comparison following two‐way ANOVA is indicated by superscript letters.

CaMean = weighted mean calcium concentration; CaPeak = most frequent calcium concentration; CaWidth = full width at half maximum of the bone mineralization density distribution, an index for the heterogeneity of mineralization; CaLow = percentage of bone area having a calcium concentration below 17.68 wt% Ca, representing the percentage of low mineralized lamellar bone undergoing the primary bone mineralization process; B.Ar = Bone Area.

a

p < .001.

b

p < .01.

c

p < .05 versus WT.

d

p < .001.

e

p < .01.

f

p < .05 versus 6 weeks.

g

p < .001.

h

p < .05 versus 4 months (all based on Tukey post hoc comparison).