Table 1.
Subject | cDNA changea | Protein change | ACMG category | Minor allele frequencyb | Conservationc | Functional predictiond | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 KG | ExAC | gnomAD | Phastcons | Phylop | SIFT | PolyPhen-2 | MutationTaster | CADD | DANN | ||||
F027 | c.1772G > A | p.R591Q | LP | 0 | 0.00016 | 0.00014 | 0.988 | 4.419 | Damaging | Possibly damaging | Disease causing | 5.172 | 0.999 |
L010 | c.3887A > G | p.E1296G | LP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.104 | 2.351 | Damaging | Probably damaging | Disease causing | 4.157 | 0.998 |
aThe GenBank accession number of FANCA is NM_000135
bMinor allele frequencies were estimated according to the databases of the 1000 Genomes (1 KG) Project, ExAC and gnomAD
cThe more conserved the position, the closer is the Phastcons score to 1. Positive score represents predicted conserved site by Phylop, while larger value means higher conservation
dMutation assessment by the SIFT, PolyPhen-2, MutationTaster, CADD and DANN tools. Higher CADD and DANN scores suggest that variants are more likely to have deleterious effects. CADD cutoff is usually set as 4, while 0.93 is for the DANN cutoff