Table 4.
Multidimensional comparison between models using all seven metrics of the feasible torque space. The Mahalanobis distance and associated p-value for comparisons between all models are reported. In addition to comparing all simulated conditions to the baseline model (column 1), simulated conditions are also compared to each other (older adult vs. RCT 1, etc.).
| Baseline | Older Adult | RCT 1 | RCT 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Older Adult |
55.3 (p<0.0001) |
|||
| RCT 1 |
10.9 (p<0.0001) |
44.7 (p<0.0001) |
||
| RCT 2 |
148.0 (p<0.0001) |
203.3 (p<0.0001) |
158.6 (p<0.0001) |
|
| RCT 3 |
130.1 (p<0.0001) |
185.4 (p<0.0001) |
140.8 (p<0.0001) |
18.1 (p<0.0001) |
RCT 1: simulated full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus
RCT 2: simulated full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus
RCT 3: simulated full-thickness tear of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and subscapularis